Stopping electronic banking fraud in Nigeria


Six years prior, a cashless arrangement turned out to be completely operational in Nigeria. The point was to urge electronic exchanges to diminish the measure of physical money in the economy. The rationale was this would limit the danger of money related violations. Notwithstanding, a significant drawback of the strategy has been inescapable electronic financial misrepresentation (e-extortion). Despite the fact that the cashless financial framework was intended to cultivate straightforwardness, control defilement and drive money related consideration, it’s compromised by the developing execution of extortion.

About N15.5 billion was lost to bank extortion in 2018. About 60% of the misrepresentation was executed web based attributable to accessible web based and tech-appraised banking administrations. Analysts have examined measurements of electronic extortion in Nigeria. Three were discovered: inward extortion did by banking staff; outer misrepresentation did by conventional Nigerians; and joint effort among fraudsters and banking staff.

We found that wasteful management, non-execution of oversight by territorial heads of banks, and poor follow-up on clients’ locations (Know Your Customer) represented the misrepresentation that occurred.

Our examination gives the financial business, banking open and speculators with basic pointers on the best way to diminish extortion.

Various kinds of electronic financial extortion in Nigeria

Our investigation included gathering information just as leading meetings with 30 individuals. These included casualties of bank misrepresentation, bank clients who didn’t buy in to the cashless approach and extortion analysts at the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

These were the basic examples we revealed.

Insider extortion: By insider, we mean those working with banks or those in a relationship with account holders. Here, the extortion was only executed by individuals from staff in the financial framework who misused the key position they held in the framework and their grip of how it functions. Banking establishments and clients were their casualties.

A model we ran over during our exploration was the situation of a N90 million (US$452,261) extortion executed by a record official of a significant restaurant in Lagos State. The activity of this record official was to gather the diner’s takings and store them at the bank. A misrepresentation investigator revealed to us that:

As the record official he would gather cash every day and was required to credit the organization’s record. In any case, he would gather cash on Monday and hotel it and gather on Tuesday and not stop it. He was missing one day out. He did this consistently until he had the option to round up N90 million. As of now, when the diner the executives raised the alert for them, he fled and couldn’t be found. We anyway utilized his sister to capture him. We were just ready to recoup N8 million naira from him. He had utilized piece of the cash to compose his wedding, had a child and nearly finished a four-room home at another region in Lagos.

Bank misrepresentation is frequently fruitful on the grounds that numerous Nigerians don’t buy in to exchange alarms. The restaurant the board believed their record official however didn’t realize that he was unscrupulous.

Untouchable extortion: These culprits were outer to the financial framework. They blossomed with their web abilities and here and there on their comprehension of the casualties’ everyday practice and personality.

A model we ran over was the fake utilization of bank confirmation numbers (BVN). These were made obligatory by the Central Bank of Nigeria in 2014. All ledger holders needed to embrace biometric enlistment. The expectation was to guarantee security and check misrepresentation.

However, fraudsters have figured out how to swindle the framework by sending bank clients bogus messages requesting their bank confirmation subtleties. As one casualty disclosed to us:

I expected to make a few exchanges and I set out toward my bank. I had called my record official early. On getting to the bank, I associated my PC and got a mail from an alleged same bank. I was approached to tap on a connection and flexibly my BVN subtleties for update of my record or face administration suspension on the record. I just tapped the connection and provided my subtleties and see, N1 million charge alert went ahead my telephone inside five minutes! I was stunned and crushed yet before we could do anything they had pulled back everything.

Community oriented extortion: This included joint effort between bank staff and fraudsters outside the financial framework. Banks and individual record holders were the people in question. For instance, bank staff could give account subtleties of clients to the working together fraudster.

Administration holes

Notwithstanding this frail administration design, which is still not misrepresentation evidence, bank officials revealed having set up components which had restricted the occurrence of extortion. One was conveying data to clients who bought in to electronic cautions. Through this, banks contact and send hostile to extortion messages to their clients.

Attributable to reputational hazard, banks attempt to cease from open indictment of failing staff. We found that banks received disgracing as a component for imparting discipline inside their associations while endeavoring to back out “rotten ones” through hailing of their pictures on PCs and over the financial business.

There is a need to check misrepresentation through client mindfulness and monetary proficiency training.

While fraudsters keep on planning better approaches for taking a shot at clients’ vulnerabilities, Nigerian banks need to utilize the Cybercrime Act to arraign guilty parties as an approach to support trust in the financial division and stop misrepresentation later on.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here